The indispensable research blog on the science of the modern workplace, covering everything from leadership and management to the behavioral, social, and cognitive dynamics behind performance and achievement.
It’s common knowledge that clothes have a strong influence over the way other people perceive us; you may be talented and qualified, but sweatpants at a job interview probably won’t communicate your ambition to a potential boss.
But clothes don’t just shape the way other people see us. New research from a team of psychological scientists from California State University, Northridge and Columbia University finds that the clothes we wear can also influence the way we think.
Across five experiments, study authors Michael Slepian, Simon Ferber, Joshua Gold, and Abraham Rutchick found that dressing to impress enhanced people’s ability to engage in abstract thinking.
“The formality of clothing might not only influence the way others perceive a person, and how people perceive themselves, but could influence decision making in important ways through its influence on processing style,” the researchers write.
Even with a deadline looming and a pile of work, many people still find themselves wasting time checking social media or reading up on the latest sports scores. For businesses, procrastination can take a serious toll on productivity; for employees, wasting too much time can ruin deadlines as well as relationships.
New evidence suggests that procrastination doesn’t just hurt your work, it may also seriously damage your health.
A recent study indicates that chronic procrastination may make people more vulnerable to serious health conditions, like cardiovascular disease and hypertension.
Psychological scientist Fuschia Sirois of Bishop’s University in Quebec reports that trait procrastination—that is, a tendency to delay important tasks despite the negative consequences—was significantly associated with having hypertension or cardiovascular disease (HT/CVD) even after controlling for the effects of age, race, educational level, and other personality factors.
Evidence suggests that putting off…
Some economists argue that a business leader’s primary responsibility is to maximize company profits and that the pursuit of any other goal, including contributing to the broader welfare, is just bad business.
Consider a CEO’s plan to provide employees with free, healthy meals. On the one hand, the CEO could justify the policy on the basis of a moral obligation to care for employees’ health. On the other hand, the CEO could use a pragmatic explanation; the availability of meals will motivate employees to work longer hours.
To get this plan off the ground the CEO must decide on the best way to justify this decision to stakeholders. Will the plan garner more support if it’s described as a moral obligation to contribute to employee well-being, or simply a way to improve the company’s bottom line?
According to a new study recently…
Between juggling responsibilities at home and the office, working parents often report feeling stressed over conflicting demands on their time.
Employees who were part of a new study on reducing work-family conflict reported spending significantly more time with their kids without reducing their number of working hours.
An interdisciplinary team of behavioral researchers carried out the study as part of a larger initiative undertaken by The National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention called the Work, Family and Health Study with the goal of improving the health of workers and their families, while also benefiting employers.
The researchers used an intervention called Support-Transform-Achieve-Results (STAR) that focused on training supervisors at a Fortune 500 IT company to be more supportive of their employees’ personal and family lives.
The STAR intervention’s emphasis on supervisor support and flexibility was expected…
Facebook claims more than 1 billion users, and Apple is widely cited as the world’s most valuable company. Constant technological innovation over the past few decades influences almost every aspect of our daily lives. However, new research suggests that you may want to think twice before betting on the next high-tech trend.
Across three experiments, psychological scientists Brent Clark from the University of South Dakota and Christopher Robert and Stephen Hampton of the University of Missouri demonstrated that people show an implicit association between technology and success, a phenomenon they call the ‘‘technology effect.’’
“We found that people unconsciously associate technology with the notion of success, and this association influences decisions about things like financial decisions, and forecasts of business performance,” says Chris Robert. “It is important to determine how this assumption may affect people’s choices because many important decisions involve technology…