New Research From Clinical Psychological Science

Personality in a Hierarchical Model of Psychopathology
Thomas A. Widiger, Martin Sellbom, Michael Chmielewski, Lee Anna Clark, Colin G. DeYoung, Roman Kotov, Robert F. Krueger, Donald R. Lynam, Joshua D. Miller, Stephanie Mullins-Sweatt, Douglas B. Samuel, Susan C. South, Jennifer L. Tackett, Katherine M. Thomas, David Watson, and Aidan G. C. Wright

Traditional classifications of psychopathology (e.g., the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, or DSM) categorize different combinations of symptoms onto syndromes and suggest treatments for each syndrome. The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) is an alternative that considers different domains of psychopathology (e.g., internalizing, detachment) that derive from empirical research and thus organize psychopathology along these domains. Widiger et al. discuss the role of personality within the HiTOP. Different personality-trait configurations contribute differently to the development and evolution of psychopathology. Therefore, the structure of personality provides a fundamental base for the HiTOP, and personality should perhaps become the focus of preventive interventions, before the onset of psychopathology. Consistent with this idea, developing preventions and treatment protocols for domains of personality rather than (or in addition to) treating disorders and syndromes might contribute to improvements in quality of life and health.

Is Worse Attention a Risk Factor for or a Consequence of Depression, or Are Worse Attention and Depression Better Accounted for by Stress? A Prospective Test of Three Hypotheses
Naoise Mac Giollabhui, Thomas M. Olino, Johanna Nielsen, Lyn Y. Abramson, and Lauren B. Alloy

Impaired cognitive functioning (e.g., attention deficits) usually accompanies depression, but is it caused by depression, a cause for depression, or are both caused by a third process (e.g., stress)? For 3 years, Mac Giollabhui et al. collected data from adolescents and their caregivers regarding depressive diagnosis, depressive symptoms, stressful life events, emotional maltreatment, and attention — sustained attention (i.e., focusing on one task for a long period of time), divided attention (i.e., focusing on two or more different tasks), selective attention (i.e., focusing on one task while ignoring distractions), and switching attention (i.e., switching back and forth between tasks). Mac Giollabhui and colleagues found that the relationship between depression and attention is complex and not confined to depressive episodes. Only decreases in divided attention predicted future depressive symptoms, but switching attention declined before the first episode of depression and recovered after the episode. In fact, decreases in switching attention predicted increases in depressive symptoms, which in turn predicted worse selective and switching attention. Childhood stress, but not recent maltreatment, was associated with increases in depressive symptoms and decreases in switching attention. Overall, these results suggest the importance of considering the role of external risk factors that might increase depression and impaired cognition.

Social Anxiety and Social Behavior: A Test of Predictions From an Evolutionary Model
Erin B. Tone, Eddy Nahmias, Roger Bakeman, Trevor Kvaran, Sarah F. Brosnan, Negar Fani, and Elizabeth A. Schroth

How does social anxiety — fear and avoidance of social situations— influence social behavior in competitive contexts? Participants reported their social anxiety levels and completed a Prisoner’s Dilemma game in which they selected whether they wanted to cooperate with or defect from a coplayer. The coplayer, which was always a computer, although participants were informed of it only in some of the trials, used an algorithm to decide whether to cooperate or defect. Afterward, participants reported their experiences and their goals during the game. Participants with higher social anxiety reported (a) more competitive goals than cooperative or individualistic goals and (b) greater nervousness and anger toward the coplayer during the game. Participants with higher social anxiety also tended to defect after the coplayer was cooperative. So, social anxiety predicted a tendency to respond aversively to positive behavior from others. This tendency may reflect self-protection and a lack of trust in others or an unwillingness to reciprocate positive behavior.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.
In the interest of transparency, we do not accept anonymous comments.
Required fields are marked*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.