Why Coffee Shops Boost Concentration
New research might explain why many people who have the option of working from home readily swap out their pajamas for pants and their couch for a seat at the local coffee shop – sitting next to someone busily typing away can increase your own concentration and mental effort.
In two experiments, Belgian psychological scientists Kobe Desender, Sarah Beurms, and Eva Van den Bussche demonstrated that — under the right circumstances — concentration can be contagious.
“In the current study, we showed for the first time that the exertion of mental effort is contagious. Simply performing a task next to a person who exerts a lot of effort in a task will make you do the same,” the researchers write in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
For the first experiment, two participants (A and B) were seated next to each other at a shared computer screen and keyboard as they completed a measure called a Simon task. A colored square would appear on either the right or left side of the computer screen; the square could be one of four different colors (blue, yellow, green, or orange). Each participant was assigned two target colors, so whenever a blue or yellow square appeared participant A would press the “k” key and whenever a green or orange square appeared participant B would press the “d” key.
What the 38 participants did not know was that the researchers would be tweaking the difficulty of the task.
It’s much easier for people to process a stimulus that shares a location with the response; so the participant sitting on the left should have faster, more accurate response times when the square appears on the left side of the screen (congruent) compared to the right side (incongruent).
While participant B always had 50% incongruent trials, their partner—unlucky participant A—alternated between very challenging blocks of 90% incongruence and low-effort blocks of 10% incongruence. This meant that participant A had to concentrate much harder to maintain the same performance level as participant B.
The Simon task isn’t competitive and doesn’t rely on teamwork, but the data showed that when one person was working really hard the person sitting next to them began to work harder as well. When participant A was slogging through the most challenging blocks, participant B’s reaction times and accuracy improved.
To rule out the possibility that participants were reacting to each other’s screens, Desender and colleagues designed a second experiment. Again, 38 participants completed a Simon task, only this time the participants were separated by a cardboard barrier; participants could still see each other, but they couldn’t see their counterpart’s screens at all.
Again, the results revealed that one person’s increased mental effort spread to their counterpart: Those in the 50/50 incongruent condition improved their reaction times when their counterparts were completing the exceptionally challenging 90% incongruent blocks.
“In our study, there were no incentives for exerting high or low levels of effort, but nevertheless participants exert more mental effort when the person next to them was doing so,” the researchers explain. “Thus, subtle effects of effort contagion, as observed in the current study, expose at least one of the boundaries within which people tend to avoid high effort.”
Exactly how people were able to discern their partner’s level of effort wasn’t clear. One theory the researchers proposed is that people used body posture to infer each other’s level of effort. Another possibility is that people automatically match each other’s mental effort, much like we unconsciously copy other people’s yawns or foot tapping.
Desender, K., Beurms, S., & Van den Bussche, E. (2015). Is mental effort exertion contagious? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2) 624-631. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0923-3
APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.
Please login with your APS account to comment.