image description
Volume 35, Issue1January/February 2022
The Grand Challenges of Psychological Science
An unprecedented confluence of forces has created what many psychological scientists consider an existential threat to the field. APS members share their concerns and hopes.

About the Observer

Published 6 times per year by the Association for Psychological Science, the Observer educates and informs on matters affecting the research, academic, and applied disciplines of psychology; promotes the scientific values of APS members; reports on issues of international interest to the psychological science community; and provides a vehicle for the dissemination on information about APS.

APS members receive the Observer newsletter and may access the online archive going back to 1988.

Looking to connect with the Observer? Visit the About page to learn about writing for us, advertising, reprints, and more. We’d love to hear from you. If you have questions about your subscription, please email

Latest Under the Cortex Podcast

thumb image

Trending Topics >

  • Thumbnail Image for Myths and Misinformation

    Myths and Misinformation

    How does misinformation spread and how do we combat it? Psychological science sheds light on the mechanisms underlying misinformation and ‘fake news.’


Up Front


    The Magnitude of Our Mythology

    Jennifer L. Eberhardt and Jennifer A. Richeson explore the persistent mythology of racial progress–a prevailing narrative that progress toward racial equality is steadily, linearly, naturally, and automatically getting better across time.

  • Much More Online

    Featuring the Under the Cortext year in review, an interview series on communicating psychological science, and more.

Recent Research

  • Research Briefs

    Boosting Understanding and Identification of Scientific Consensus Can Help to Correct False Beliefs Aart van Stekelenburg, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, and Moniek BuijzenPsychological Science This research suggests that using a communication strategy that increases people’s understanding of and ability to identify scientific consensus might lead them to correct their misperceptions in certain domains. Participants who held false beliefs were exposed to either a control activity or a boosting intervention designed to empower them to first understand the value of scientific consensus and then identify it. Afterward, they read a news article about a scientific consensus opposing their beliefs. Compared with the control group, participants exposed to the boosting intervention were more likely to correct their false beliefs.

Government Relations

APS Spotlight


First Person

More From This Issue