Callous-Unemotional Traits in Children

I first met Tom, a 13-year-old boy at a school for children with emotional and behavioral difficulties, when first starting out on my PhD research. Tom was a charming and effusive pupil and I instantly warmed to him. One day, over a cup of tea in the staff room, I mentioned to two of the teachers how delightful I found Tom. One of them simply gave me a wry smile; the other was not so reserved. He shared his rather frank view that Tom was the “devil incarnate.” Over the following months I began to see a very different young person. I observed behavior that was characterised by violent bullying, callous blackmail of other boys, attempts to intimidate members of staff, and lack of regret for his actions. As my research progressed it became clear that Tom typified a particular kind of youth with antisocial behavior, those with callous-unemotional traits.

Callous–unemotional traits, such as limited empathy,  a lack of guilt, and shallow affect have received increased attention from both researchers and clinicians in recent years. Paul Frick trail-blazed research in this area by operationalizing a developmentally sensitive measure to capture such traits in children. Over the years, work by a formidable collective of colleagues, including Frick, at the University of New Orleans; James Blair, at the National Institute of Mental Health; Don Lynam, at Purdue University; Adelle Forth, at Carleton University, Canada; Dustin Pardini, at the University of Pittsburgh; and Mark Dadds, at the University of New South Wales, Australia, have employed a variety of methodologies to convincingly demonstrate that callous-unemotional traits delineate a group of youth at risk for severe and violent antisocial behavior that often persists into adulthood. These traits are also associated with increased risk of adult psychopathy.

My own program of research is focused on the study of children with antisocial behavior — both those with and without high levels of callous-unemotional traits. I have been particularly motivated to use multiple (twin model-fitting, genotyping, experimental psychology, and brain imaging) methods in order to shed light on the underlying mechanisms that may make some children more vulnerable to antisocial behavior. My PhD training was interdisciplinary and I was very fortunate to be able to work with data from the Twins Early Development Study in collaboration with Robert Plomin of King’s College London.

In 2005, we published a paper investigating heritability of antisocial behavior in seven-year-old children with/without high levels of callous-unemotional traits. Antisocial behavior with high levels of callous-unemotional traits appeared strongly heritable, whereas antisocial behavior with lower levels of callous-unemotional traits was (for the most part) explained by environmental factors. This study provided further indication that callous-unemotional traits could have utility as a subgrouping factor among children with antisocial behavior. It also got me hooked in this area of research.

Establishing a Link

Our subsequent twin analyses have increased our understanding of callous-unemotional traits in childhood in several ways. We now know that there is substantial genetic overlap between callous-unemotional traits and antisocial behavior — in other words, the two phenotypes share risk genes. Work by my former post doc, Nathalie Fontaine, now at Indiana University, indicates that stable high levels of callous-unemotional traits are strongly heritable, in particular for boys. However, we know less about actual risk genes and no big hits have emerged so far. Work by colleagues, such as Naomi Sadeh at the University of California, San Francisco, and Edelyn Verona, at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, suggests that genetic risk for callous-unemotional traits may only express itself under unfavorable environmental circumstances. In other words, although genetic vulnerability is likely to play a role in the development of callous-unemotional traits and accompanying antisocial behavior, phenotypic expression may require specific environmental circumstances. Our own preliminary genome-wide work indicates that we may also need to investigate the contribution from rare genetic variants and gene-gene interaction.

Our research group has conducted several experimental lines of work in recent years. A study by my former PhD student, Alice Jones, now at Goldsmiths, University of London, highlighted that children with callous-unemotional traits have a very different profile of empathy problems to those seen in children with autism spectrum conditions. They have atypically blunted affective response to other people’s distress, but are perfectly capable of judging other people’s point of view (i.e., they can mentalize). Children with autism spectrum conditions appear to have the opposite pattern of difficulties. By contrast, children who display antisocial behavior, but who have low levels of callous-unemotional traits, look similar to typically developing children on these domains.

Neuroimaging work from our lab has also produced a number of new findings that have helped characterise the neurobiological vulnerabilities associated with callous-unemotional traits and antisocial behavior. Specifically, recent work with my post doc, Catherine Sebastian, has provided support for the view that in children with antisocial behavior, amygdala activity to other people’s distress (fear and sadness) is attenuated in those with high levels of callous-unemotional traits, but heightened in children with lower levels of such traits. These findings further suggest that children with or without callous-unemotional traits may develop antisocial behaviour as a result of quite different sets of underlying vulnerabilities. Parallel work led by my colleague Eamon McCrory, with whom I run our research group at University College London, has shown that a pattern of amygdala overactivity to emotional stimuli is also seen in children with histories of childhood maltreatment, a robust environmental risk factor for antisocial behaviour. One important future research aim for our group is to delineate the particular environmental risk factors that increase the likelihood of antisocial behaviour in those children with high or low levels of callous-unemotional traits.

Treating Tom

How does any of this research advance our efforts to prevent and treat children like Tom? From a clinical perspective, research in this field has taught us three important things. First, it is now clear that children who qualify for antisocial behavior diagnosis (conduct disorder) are a heterogeneous group and that callous-unemotional traits are helpful in characterising a distinct pattern of vulnerability and prognosis in a subset of these children. Second, longitudinal work by ourselves and others indicates that callous-unemotional traits are malleable. New studies by several colleagues suggest these children respond to warm parenting, but may be less responsive to negative parenting. Third, the emerging pattern of distinct neurocognitive vulnerability to antisocial behavior in children with high vs. low levels of callous-unemotional traits has raised the possibility of tailoring existing interventions to suit the specific profile of atypical affective processing that characterises each group of children. For example, a recent study by Dadds and colleagues suggests that children with high levels of callous-unemotional traits may benefit from training in emotional literacy and emotional recognition. We need to build on these preliminary advances in applying basic research findings to inform clinical practice. I am hopeful that over the next decade we will make significant strides in being able to provide effective help and support to children like Tom.

Further Reading

Blair, R. J. (2010). Neuroimaging of psychopathy and antisocial behavior: A targeted review. Current Psychiatry Reports, 12, 76–82

Dadds, M. R., Cauchi, A. J., Wimalaweera, S., Hawes, D. J., & Brennan, J. (2012). Outcomes, moderators, and mediators of empathic-emotion recognition training for complex conduct problems in childhood. Psychiatry Research,199, 201–207.

McCrory, E, De Brito, S. A., Sebastian, C. L., Mechelli, A., Bird, G., Kelly, P. & Viding, E. (2011). Heightened neural reactivity to threat in child victims of family violence. Current Biology, 21, 947–948.

Pardini, D., & Frick, P. J. (2013). Multiple developmental pathways to conduct disorder: current conceptualizations and clinical implications. Journal of Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 22, 20–25.

Sebastian, C. L., McCrory, E. J. P, Cecil, C. A. M., Lockwood, P. L., De Brito, S. A., Fontaine, N. M. G., & Viding, E. (2012). Neural responses to affective and cognitive theory of mind in children with conduct problems and varying levels of callous-unemotional traits. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69, 814– 822.

Viding, E., & McCrory, E. J. (2012). Genetic and neurocognitive contributions to the development of psychopathy. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 969–983.

Viding, E., Sebastian, C. L., Dadds, M. R., Lockwood, P. L., Cecil, C. A. M., DeBrito, S., McCrory, E. J. (2012). Amygdala response to pre-attentive masked fear is associated with callous-unemotional traits in children with conduct problems. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 1109–1116.


This is both a fascinating and an urgently important line of research.

It seems logical to me that different underlying causes might result in antisocial behaviors, in the same way that entirely different underlying causes (food poisoning or the flu virus, etc.) can cause the same symptoms of fever/vomiting/diarrhea.

Antisocial behaviors are a *symptom* that something is wrong with the child or adult, something that needs to be cured.

A possible line of treatment I’ve heard of is to introduce oxytocin, the “love hormone” into those who lack empathy, so that they may possibly be able to experience tender, empathetic emotions, even if they’re artificially induced. I hope many lines of possible therapy are being tried, or I am afraid that we’re going to be overrun by antisocial/psychopathic individuals because they seem to reproduce themselves at far greater numbers than neurotypical individuals.

I’ve heard the same thing Babs, the hormone oxcytocin and serotonin release increases through the drug methamphetamine(MDMA), which allows empathy and euphoria to increase. It was introduced a long time ago to relieve symptoms of post-traumatic stress for soldiers. I see how it may help with empathy, but I don’t think children should be taking any drug at all, period.

Diet is a major contributing factor, and is linked to low SES families in numerous studies. I also believe that the lower and longer the SES is experienced the more likely the exposure to family violence – due to factors like; chronic stress, drug use (to escape the harsh reality) low education and the lack of basic needs being met.

Neuro-cognitively speaking, I would say that under any type of stress, where a family cannot function efficiently enough to introduce the luxuries (i.e, organic food, enriching activities,and trips together) into their homelife, have the propensity for many variations of illness, think about obesity, and the umbrella of diseases it causes – would you just give every overweight child lap band surgery? No, I doubt it… I think medicating children is simply a band aid approach. An ignorant solution for a much more complicated and multifaceted problem.

Please, where can parents go for help, assessment and treatment of CUT?

My husband was violent, callous & unemotional, as was his father. My son born in 1970, the same. When his sister’s 2 children were taken into care, SS refused to allow them to come to me. Instead the children were given to my husbands sister. Her daughter left home at an early age. My grandaughter returned to care under section 20. SS blamed me but I am very empathetic. Callous unemotional trait test fits all 3 generations of the Palmer family.

I too am wondering about the best therapy for adolescents with these traits as we’ve tried multiple therapies with little success. This is a generational behavioral issue in now the third generation of my husband’s family. I pray for the cycle to somehow be broken.

I went through this my entire childhood at the hands of my own sister. The mental and emotional abuse is something that has always and still does affect my life. I left home at 14 to get away from it. Even 200 miles away she still found ways to hurt my life. From the day I was born she made me her #1 target. She has only got more chaotic with age. My parents couldn’t see it for years. Not until my late 20’s did they even begin to see the REAL her. The side I had always seen. She made it to where they didn’t believe me at all. She manipulated them endlessly and she was so convincing. She has a daughter now and I worry that when she can no longer dress her up like her perfect little doll and can’t control her anymore she will do to he what she did to me. She lives for chaos and hurting people. How different my life might have been if my very own sister was not a psychopath and I was not her victim for so many years. She really messed me up…

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.