From: The Boston Globe
‘Redirect’ by Timothy D. Wilson and ‘Who’s in charge?’ by Michael S. Gazzaniga
The Boston Globe:
Common sense has a lot to say about human behavior and the human brain. Recent empirical research, though, strongly suggests that a good deal of what it has to say is wrong. This is both unfortunate and serious, since many of the practices and policies we choose as a society are based on our beliefs about human behavior and how to change it. Two new books from eminent brain researchers aim to apply these recent findings to questions of behavior, free will, and responsibility.
In “Redirect: The Surprising New Science of Psychological Change,’’ Timothy D. Wilson surveys a variety of social programs and policies that, it turns out, have been based on false assumptions about the way we think. He begins with the example of Critical Incident Stress Debriefing, whose premise is “that when people have experienced a traumatic event they should air their feelings as soon as possible, so that they don’t bottle up these feelings and develop post-traumatic stress disorder.’’ This might sound reasonable, but according to Wilson, it simply doesn’t work: In fact, empirical testing strongly suggests that CISD has a tendency to increase anxiety and depression by retraumatizing people, delaying any healing.
Read the full story: The Boston GlobeMore of our Members in the Media >
APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.
Please login with your APS account to comment.