A Hub for Teaching Psychology

What is the best way to teach psychology? How should students study to learn? To date there has been no coordinated effort to examine these questions. Whereas a large body of pedagogical research on teaching and learning exists, I have found that the absolute majority of research is conducted within individual classes at different institutions. Furthermore, few studies test theoretically derived questions and not enough classroom research sufficiently translates and tests lab findings.

With backing from the APS Fund for Teaching and Public Understanding of Psychological Science, Regan A. R. Gurung created an online resource designed to connect educational psychologists with the literature and tools necessary to conduct research on a larger scale.

The reasons for these shortcomings are clear. Relevant research is published in diverse areas. Many faculty do not have the time to fully explore the rich literature on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Interested faculty like me often lack the time, network, design expertise, or experience to conduct classroom research. The time to alleviate these problems has arrived.

Thanks to support from the APS Fund for Teaching and Public Understanding of Psychological Science, I have been able to design a new online resource to serve pedagogical researchers. The site helps coordinate scholarship on teaching and learning with a variety of tools and resources. It can also foster collaborations between researchers investigating the science of teaching and learning to catalyze further research on these topics.

The Hub for Introductory Psychology and Pedagogical Research (HIPPR) provides the following:

  • Literature Central: A central clearinghouse for research on teaching Introduction to Psychology and pedagogy in general, providing research summaries from multiple disciplines to aid future research.
  • Collaborator Finder: Instructors can find collaborators, faculty who have similar pedagogical questions, or instructors willing to volunteer their classes/students for testing of pedagogical interventions.
  • Scales-n-More: A collection of questionnaires and surveys commonly used in pedagogical inquiry that are ready for use. A particularly handy resource for novice pedagogical researchers, these measures will also help ensure comparisons across samples.
  • Future innovations will include a Data Repository (datasets for secondary analyses) and a Virtual File-Drawer (brief reports of unpublished studies that may prove helpful in the design of additional work).

You can learn more about HIPPR and the tools it offers here.



There are 21 year I teach Educational Psychology and Learning Psychology in a teacher education course. Well, unfortunately the students’ general profile is characterized by bad habits of study and a poor school education in high school. The majority of them work in jobs not related to education during the day and go to college at night. I feel that they do not learn in a desirable level. And I believe that is possible to do it best. Do you think the “Hub” can help me? If yes, tell me how, please. Maybe we can conduct some research in collaboration.


You touch on a key issue Paolo. YEs, the Hub can help because on the scales page are a number of surveys that you can give to students to assess their study habits and also use to get them to study better (i.e., completing the scale can draw their attention to what works). You can also share with students some findings from the Literature page.

Plus, looking at the collaborator page, you may find folks willing to work on designing interventions to help.

All the best.


Fantastic start on a wonderful resource! I look forward to participating in the future. Thanks for your work on this.

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.