Studies Explore Interplay Between Self-Control, Reward Processing, and Diet

PAFF_092713_selfcontrolreward_articleTwo new studies investigate the relationship between self-control and reward processing for chronic dieters and people who would like to control their food intake.

The Future Is Now: Reducing Impulsivity and Energy Intake Using Episodic Future Thinking

Tinuke Oluyomi Daniel, Christina M. Stanton, and Leonard H. Epstein

Past studies have shown that thinking about a future event reduces delay discounting — when people forgo large future rewards for immediate smaller rewards. Overweight women who reported a desire to control their food intake thought about episodic events in the future or episodic events in the recent past during a delay-discounting task involving money and during an unrestricted-eating opportunity. Participants who thought about episodic future events discounted less during the monetary task and ate fewer calories than did those who thought about episodic past events. This suggests that future thinking could be a useful tool for increasing impulse control.

Published online September 10, 2013 in Psychological Science.

Self-Regulatory Depletion Enhances Neural Responses to Rewards and Impairs Top-Down Control

Dylan D. Wagner, Myra Altman, Rebecca G. Boswell, William M. Kelley, and Todd F. Heatherton

Some models of self-regulation suggest that self-control is a limited resource and that when it is depleted, we are more likely to engage in impulsive and undesirable behaviors. Women who were chronic dieters completed an attention-control task that did or did not deplete their self-control and then underwent fMRI while viewing images of people, nature, or food. Depleted dieters had greater activity in areas of the brain related to coding of reward values and reduced connectivity between those areas and areas related to self-control. This indicates that such depletion reduces a person’s ability to engage self-control and alters the neurological processing of rewards.

Published online September 11, 2013 in Psychological Science.

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.