Bicyclists Beware: The Psychology of Car-Bike Crash Risks

With bike-sharing programs in more than 500 cities worldwide accounting for a combined fleet of over 500,000 bicycles, cars are increasingly sharing urban streets with bicycles.PAFF_082114_BikesCarsMOTR_newsfeature

When crashes between bikes and cars occur they are often particularly dangerous for the cyclist. In 2012 alone, 722 bicyclists were killed in crashes with motor vehicles– a 6 percent increase from 2011, according to US government statistics.

To better understand the cause of crashes between cars and bikes, psychological scientists Nadine Chaurand and Patricia Delhomme of The French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport looked at differences in how cyclists and drivers perceive traffic risks.

Using an online survey, Chaurand and Delhomme asked 336 cyclists and 92 drivers to rate how likely various car-bike traffic scenarios were to cause a crash. The scenarios also included interactions between only cars, only bikes, and a car and a bike. In each of the scenarios, one of the parties was committing a traffic violation, such as tailgating or going through a red light.

The researchers found that drivers and cyclists had several commonalities in their perceptions of risk. For example, variables previously shown to impact risk perception for drivers–such as driving experience or perceived driving skill–had an effect on cyclists as well. Both cyclists and drivers also perceived less risk when they imagined themselves, as opposed to another vehicle, as the one making a traffic violation.

The study also found key differences in risk perception that could have important implications for improving road safety for both cyclists and drivers.

For nearly every bike-car interaction cyclists saw their own traffic violations as being riskier than drivers did. Cyclists also saw bike-car interactions as posing the greatest crash risk. However, drivers perceived interactions with other cars, rather than bikes, as being the most likely to lead to a crash.

“The fact that car drivers perceived an interaction with a bike as less dangerous than cyclists did could imply that when in interaction with a bike, drivers are not as careful as they should be in avoiding a crash,” Chaurand and Delhomme write in the journal Accident Analysis and Prevention, “or at least less careful than cyclists are.”

The researchers caution that the less people perceive risk in a given situation the more likely they are to adopt risky behaviors–and the more likely they are to be involved in crashes.



Chaurand, N., Delhomme, P. (2013) Cyclists and drivers in road interactions: A comparison of perceived crash risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention. 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.005


I am pretty careful around cyclists on the road as I used to be one. What really bothers me however are the number of cyclists using the footpath. This puts pedestrians at risk. Also the share use paths are bad news for pedestrians as well. I never ever rode on the footpath and think throwing cyclists and vulnerable pedestrians together is bad news. It is an epidemic in my home town and I have been knocked down twice. Footpath and walking trails should not be compromised like this. There are lots of people who walk that cannot afford a fall

Or to put that another way, if the car driver doesn’t see themselves getting injured in a potential crash, they don’t do so much to avoid it.

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.