From: BBC

A new way to look at emotions – and how to master yours

One day at graduate school, one of Lisa Feldman Barrett’s colleagues asked her out on a date. She didn’t really fancy him, but she had been in the lab all day and felt like a change of scenery, so she agreed to go to the local coffee shop. As they chatted, however, she started to become flushed in the face, her stomach was churning, and her head seemed to whirl. Maybe she was wrong, she thought: perhaps she really did like him. By the time they left, she’d already agreed to go on a second date.

How could someone mistake the rush of an infection for the fever of love? A psychologist at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts, Barrett has spent her career examining the ways we construct emotions, culminating in a recent book – How Emotions Are Made – and her experience on that date is just one of many examples that illustrate the ways our feelings can confound us.

Read the whole story: BBC


I found it singular how Schachter’s two-factors theory of emotions (e.g. Schachter & Singer, 1962) could be completely overlooked in this article. How can the journalist explain the phenomena described in this BBC piece (sic) in terms of “Barrett’s theory?”
There is no new (sic) “Barrett’s theory”– what we’re talking about here is a well-established-phenomenon already known as social labeling of emotional arousal. Really nothing new. How can a BBC journalist sell it as “a new theory”? Thank you.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.
In the interest of transparency, we do not accept anonymous comments.
Required fields are marked*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.