Anti-Prejudice Campaigns Do More Harm Than Good?

This is a photo of a hand excluding a green fish from a group of orange fish.A study in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science demonstrated that some anti-prejudice campaigns are not only ineffective, they may actually encourage prejudice.

The researchers found that autonomy-focused interventions, which emphasize anti-prejudice as a personal value, can effectively reduce prejudice. But controlling anti-prejudice messages, which focus on what people should and shouldn’t do, may actually increase prejudice.

In one experiment, the researchers asked participants to read anti-prejudice brochures with either a controlling or an autonomy-focused message. A third group read no brochure at all. Then, a questionnaire was used to measure prejudice. Participants who read the autonomy-focused brochure displayed less prejudice than did the other two groups. However, participants who had read the controlling brochure actually displayed more prejudice that those who read no brochure at all. Similar results were obtained in a second experiment.

Based on the results, the authors suggest that organizations should concentrate on emphasizing the personal benefits of diversity and nonprejudice, and avoid interventions that use pressuring language or prescribe specific, strict outcomes.

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.