Members in the Media
From: The Telegraph

Forensic experts ‘biased towards side which pays them’

The Telegraph:

Although forensic experts are meant to be completely impartial when giving an expert opinion to the jury, they tend to favour the side which employs them.

A study found that while the experts believed they were being impartial, there was an “allegiance effect” which appeared to colour their judgements.

Researchers from the University of Virginia recruited 118 forensic psychologists and psychiatrists to evaluate a batch of case files on sexually violent offenders, telling them the work was commissioned by either prosecution or defence lawyers.

But although each expert reviewed the same four files and used the same system to assess the criminals, their judgements varied depending on who they believed was paying them.

Read the whole story: The Telegraph

More of our Members in the Media >

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.