Strengthening Psychological Science with Specialized Statistical Review
Focused technical assessments by statistical experts could help psychology journals defend against the improper use of statistics. More
Focused technical assessments by statistical experts could help psychology journals defend against the improper use of statistics. More
There are a few simple ways to bring your research expertise and interest in serving as a peer reviewer to the attention of Scientific Review Officers at NIH. More
The National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices (NREPP) is recruiting candidates to become certified reviewers tasked with rating the methodological quality and effectiveness of program evaluations. Funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), NREPP is an evidence-based repository and review system providing reliable information on More
To put it bluntly, academic psychology’s public reputation seems to be in free fall. When the press coverage of the “replicability crisis” in psychological science first began a few years ago, reporters generally broached the topic in a respectful and delicate fashion, hinting at problems but not trumpeting them. That More
Psychological scientists are increasingly integrating multiple areas of study and levels of analyses into their research, but they face myriad challenges in doing so. Editors from some of the most esteemed journals in the field discuss their viewpoints on conducting and publishing integrative science. More
In a senior seminar on language acquisition, a group of seven students successfully edited two Wikipedia articles and achieved Good Article status. A Good Article meets a basic set of criteria that indicate the material is well written, neutral, and appropriately sourced. More