APS
31st APS Annual Convention · 2019
Ideologically Motivated Reasoning with Political Arguments
- Dustin Calvillo
California State University, San Marcos - Alexander Swan
Eureka College - Abraham Rutchick
California State University, Northridge
Abstract
This study examined how participants’ political ideology affects their reasoning from syllogisms with liberal and conservative conclusions. Participants (N = 414) demonstrated motivated reasoning. Liberal participants were more likely to believe that liberal conclusions were valid and conservative participants were more likely to believe that conservative conclusions were valid.
Cognitive Processes