APS

30th APS Annual Convention · 2018

Only Age of Child Complainant Influences Juror Decision-Making When Presented with Truncated Testimony

San Francisco, CA · May 2018

Poster · General

  • Julien Gross
    University of Otago
  • Alice McClintock
    University of Otago
  • Emilia Barna
    University of Otago
  • Wulin Tian
    University of Otago
  • Weiwei Zhang
    University of Otago
  • Harlene Hayne
    University of Otago

Abstract

Video recordings of children's evidential interviews can serve as their evidence in court; videos can then be truncated such that the jury does not see the entire interview. Under various conditions, we found that this practice does not influence juror decision-making, but the age of the child complainant does.

Forensic/Criminal Justice

← Poster Session XX