APS

2025 APS Annual Convention · 2025

Using AI in Qualitative Analysis: Can Chatgpt and Human Raters Agree?

Washington, DC · May 2025

Poster · Methodology

  • Evelyn White
    California State University, Sacramento
  • Rebecca Lucke
    California State University, Sacramento
  • Sharn Kang
    California State University, Sacramento
  • Taiven Haggett
    California State University, Sacramento
  • Athena Bear
    California State University, Sacramento
  • Jianjian Qin
    California State University, Sacramento

Abstract

We propose investigating ChatGPT's potential to code qualitative responses using a human-established codebook. By comparing ChatGPT’s results to trained human raters, we aim to assess inter-rater reliability between ChatGPT and humans, and thus explore the potential of using AI to reduce the cost of qualitative analysis without compromising scientific rigor.

Other

← Poster Session III - Research Proposal Posters