When Clothing Style Influences Cognitive Style

PAFF_050815_ClothesCognitiveStyle_newsfeatureIt’s common knowledge that clothes have a strong influence over the way other people perceive us; you may be talented and qualified, but sweatpants at a job interview probably won’t communicate your ambition to a potential boss.

But clothes don’t just shape the way other people see us. New research from a team of psychological scientists from California State University, Northridge and Columbia University finds that the clothes we wear can also influence the way we think.

Across five experiments, study authors Michael Slepian, Simon Ferber, Joshua Gold, and Abraham Rutchick found that dressing to impress enhanced people’s ability to engage in abstract thinking.

“The formality of clothing might not only influence the way others perceive a person, and how people perceive themselves, but could influence decision making in important ways through its influence on processing style,” the researchers write.

Slepian and colleagues were interested in studying how formal clothing, much like formal language, can enhance social or psychological distance between people. For example, people often address an unfamiliar person by title, rather than by first name, even when they have the same social status.

Recent research has shown that social distance in the form of politeness can increase abstract thinking; for example, one study found that people used more abstract language when asked to address someone politely. Essentially, events that are psychologically “distant” are conceived of in a more abstract way, while events that are psychologically “near” are thought of more concretely.

Formal clothing is typically introduced in settings that are explicitly not intimate—essentially making formal clothing “socially distant” clothing.

“Specifically, as formal clothing is associated with enhanced social distance, we propose that wearing formal clothing will enhance abstract cognitive processing,” the researchers write in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science.

In one series of experiments, students wearing their normal clothes were asked to rate the formality of their attire relative to that of their peers. They then performed a series of standardized tests to measure their cognitive processing style.

The students were given a list of actions and asked to choose between abstract and concrete explanations for the action. For example, the description for ‘‘voting’’ could be either a broad term for ‘‘influencing the election’’ or a more concrete interpretation as ‘‘marking a ballot.’’

Even after controlling for socioeconomic status, students wearing more formal clothing showed stronger inclinations towards abstract processing.

In another experiment, 54 college students were asked to bring two sets of clothing to the laboratory for a study ostensibly about how people form impressions based on clothing.

The formal attire was described as being something they would wear to a job interview, while the more casual set of clothing was described as something the students would wear to class. Participants were randomly assigned to change into either their formal or their casual clothes.

The students then completed a test of their cognitive processing to determine whether they were more focused on the big picture or on more fine-grained details. After being shown a series of large letters made up of smaller letters (a large letter L or H composed of eight smaller Ls and Hs) participants had to identify each stimulus as either the big letter or the series of small letters using a computer keyboard.

As predicted, participants wearing formal clothing favored global processing (the big letters) over local processing (the smaller letters) more often than the students wearing their street clothes.

Processing style can influence many important factors in the workplace, from the way people approach decisions to the way people focus on a task. But don’t cancel casual Fridays just yet – the researchers note that further research with larger, more diverse samples is needed to better understand the extent to which formal attire can influence cognition.



Slepian, M. L., Ferber, S. N., Gold, J. M., & Rutchick, A. M. (2015). The Cognitive Consequences of Formal Clothing. Social Psychological and Personality Science. doi: 10.1177/1948550615579462


Deeply True

Wearing a sharp tailored suit makes you feel confident and authoritative. Any clothes that make you look good are going to make you feel better, but a great suit will also lend you an air of authority.

But thats litrally the study

I think a lot more research in this area is needed, but the initial findings are very interesting. I can only share insight based on how clothing affects my mood and performance. I work best when I am suitably dressed and feel I look good, and wearing the appropriate attire for the job. Dressing smart, or smart-casual makes me feel more self-confident. This helps me focus on what I am doing rather than being subconsciously worried about people’s perception of me. I wear clothes that make me feel confident – I appreciate the power of self-image.

This article is egregious. You take a bunch of young college students and dress them up in nice clothes, of course you will get them feeling “confident”. How about you go to the professional setting and do a study, you will find that people do not want to dress up and that I can be more creative in my “sweatpants” than in my stupid suit and tie. Finally, how does one analytically “correct” for socioeconomic status error?

look through some of the citations and the sources


I think you misunderstood. The article is saying abstract thinking, not creative thinking. Abstract thinking is thinking about things in a broader, more vague way. It did not talk about people feeling more confident either; the article was talking strictly in terms of global and local processing. It stated that (according to this study, which they agreed more research needed to be done on) people dressed in what they considered formal clothing thought more globally, or abstractly, while people dressed in what they considered informal, or casual, clothes thought more locally.

I am curious as to how one would deceive the participants about the study as to not bias their performance, if at all? I feel as though they could figure out what the study is about if not previously deceived and then perform based on how they think they are expected to perform. Please let me know, because I am trying to do a similar study and am having trouble with this certain concept.

I am curious as to how one would deceive the participants about the study as to not bias their performance, if at all? I feel as though they could figure out what the study is about if not previously deceived and then perform based on how they think they are expected to perform. Please let me know, because I am trying to do a similar study and am having trouble with this certain concept.

Hi McKenna-
Drop me a line, and I’ll give you some suggestions. Sorry for the delay.
-Abe Rutchick

thank you

APS regularly opens certain online articles for discussion on our website. Effective February 2021, you must be a logged-in APS member to post comments. By posting a comment, you agree to our Community Guidelines and the display of your profile information, including your name and affiliation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations present in article comments are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of APS or the article’s author. For more information, please see our Community Guidelines.

Please login with your APS account to comment.