Your source for the latest psychological research.



Dating in the Digital Age

Eli Finkel will discuss online dating at the 24th APS Annual Convention in Chicago. Register today to attend.

The report card is in, and the online dating industry won’t be putting this one on the fridge. A new scientific report concludes that although online dating offers users some very real benefits, it falls far short of its potential.

Unheard of just twenty years ago, online dating is now a billion dollar industry and one of the most common ways for singles to meet potential partners. Many websites claim that they can help you find your “soulmate.” But do these online dating services live up to all the hype?

CBS News interviewed Eli Finkel of Northwestern University, a coauthor of the Psychological Science in the Public Interest article “Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science.”

“To date, there is no compelling evidence that any online dating matching algorithm actually works,” Finkel told CBS. “If dating sites want to claim that their matching algorithm is scientifically valid, they need to adhere to the standards of science, which is something they have uniformly failed to do. In fact, our report concludes that it is unlikely that their algorithms can work, even in principle, given the limitations of the sorts of matching procedures that these sites use.”

So what should daters do? Read more in the article Online dating full of downsides, study shows: What should daters do?

Click the image to see a video on online dating from CBS This Morning.
Click the image to see a video on online dating from CBS This Morning.

For more read articles from CNN, Time, The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, ABC News, The Guardian, CBC Canada, Huffington Post UK, AOL Lifestyle UK, and msnbc.com.

ResearchBlogging.org
Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P.W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H.T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online Dating: A Critical Analysis From the Perspective of Psychological Science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13 (1).

Leave a comment below and continue the conversation.

Comments

Leave a comment.

Comments go live after a short delay. Thank you for contributing.

(required)

(required)