Special Section on Stigma in Perspectives on Psychological Science: Group Differences, Not Deficits
Psychological scientists are faced with the arduous task of identifying distinctions between humans without stigmatizing groups of people based on these differences. In this special section of Perspectives on Psychological Science, experts present reasons for why differences in gender, race, sexual orientation, and culture should not be framed as deficits within the field of psychology.
Morton Ann Gernsbacher
Stigma occurs when individuals are devalued by others for having a different trait or attributes. Gernsbacher introduces this special section on stigma within psychological science research by observing that psychological scientists have a tendency to frame individual and group differences as deficits, which enables stigma and may lead to biased interpretations of research data.
Susan T. Fiske
Psychological scientists often think in categorical dichotomies, dividing a broad population into two groups—for example, contrasting men and women and exaggerating differences between the genders. Gender entails two fundamental dimensions that characterize intergroup stigma: perceived warmth and perceived competence. These dimensions identify groups that are viewed with ambivalence and they often force trade-offs (e.g., professional women are seen as competent but cold). The dimensions add a more nuanced view of stigma—groups can be stigmatized even if they are viewed positively on one dimension and, by implication, negatively on the other dimensions.
Gregory M. Herek
For much of the 20th century, sexual-orientation differences were treated as deficits by Psychology (defined here broadly to include psychiatry and mental health professions), and it wasn’t until 1973 that homosexuality was removed from the DSM. Although Psychology is now dedicated to challenging sexual stigma through research, teaching, and advocacy, the differences-as-deficits assumption is still evident in public debates about sexual orientation and sexual minorities. Psychology still has an important role to play in eliminating sexual stigma, not only by correcting falsely held beliefs but also by addressing the underlying framework that perpetuates stigma.
James M. Jones
Research that stigmatizes specific human groups is destructive, but there are numerous historical examples of psychological research that was designed to demonstrate the inferiority of Blacks and Native Americans. Many psychological ideas explored in the lab arise from observations and experiences of the scientists themselves—in this way, having diverse scientists and psychology faculty may result in more diverse research being pursued.
Douglas Medin, Will Bennis, and Michael Chandler
There is a home-field disadvantage for cultural studies: The scientist conducting the research often uses his or her own culture as a starting point and basis of comparison with other cultures. This may result in formation of cultural differences that are not based in reality and also affects whether a group’s cultural practices seem normal or deficient. Collaborative research and taking multiple perspectives are two ways that may help overcome the home-field disadvantage.
Perspectives on Psychological Science is ranked among the top 10 general psychology journals for impact by the Institute for Scientific Information. It publishes an eclectic mix of thought-provoking articles on the latest important advances in psychology. For a copy of the article "Special Section on Stigma in Perspectives on Psychological Science: Group Differences, Not Deficits" and access to other Perspectives on Psychological Science research findings, please contact Divya Menon at 202-293-9300 or firstname.lastname@example.org.