In Defense of Brain Imaging

National Geographic:

Brain imaging has fared pretty well in its three decades of existence, all in all. A quick search of the PubMed database for one of the most popular methods, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), yields some 22,000 studies.  In 2010 the federal government promised $40 million for the Human Connectome Project, which aims to map all of the human brain’s connections. And brain imaging will no doubt play a big part in the president’s new, $4.5 billion BRAIN Initiative. If you bring up brain scanning at a summer BBQ party, your neighbors may think you’re weird, but they’ll be somewhat familiar with what you’re talking about. (Not so for, say, calcium imaging of zebrafish neurons…)

And yet, like any youngster, neuroimaging has suffered its share of embarrassing moments. In 2008, researchers from MIT reported that many high-profile imaging studies used statistical methods resulting in ‘voodoo correlations’: artificially inflated links between emotions or personality traits and specific patterns of brain activity. The next year, a Dartmouth team put a dead salmon in a scanner, showed it a bunch of photos of people, and then asked the salmon to determine what emotion the people in the photos were feeling. Thanks to random noise in the data, a small region in the fish’s brainappeared to “activate” when it was “thinking” about others’ emotions. Books like BrainwashedA Skeptic’s Guide to the MindNeuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, and the upcoming The Myth of Mirror Neurons have all added fuel to the skeptical fire.

Read the whole story: National Geographic

Leave a comment below and continue the conversation.

Comments

Leave a comment.

Comments go live after a short delay. Thank you for contributing.

(required)

(required)